Reports that Trump withdrew endorsement of Marjorie Taylor Greene remain unconfirmed amid circulating rumors
Reports that former President Donald Trump withdrew his endorsement of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene or called her a “ranting lunatic” remain unverified by major news organizations and could not be confirmed on Truth Social as of Nov. 15, 2025.
Key takeaways
- No major outlets had verified the claim: searches of The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, Reuters and The Associated Press produced no verified reporting as of Nov. 15, 2025.
- No verifiable Truth Social post: reviewers found no confirmed post on Truth Social showing Trump rescinding his endorsement or using the phrase “ranting lunatic”.
- Claim spreads on social and fringe sites: screenshots and reposts circulate on smaller platforms but lack timestamps, stable links or corroboration from primary sources.
- Implications could be significant: a confirmed withdrawal by a former president would affect fundraising, primary dynamics and local campaign strategy — but it is unconfirmed.
Main report
What we checked
Reporters and reviewers conducted a multi-step verification process to assess the claim that Trump rescinded his endorsement of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and called her a “ranting lunatic.” The review included:
- National news outlets: site and archive searches of The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, Reuters and The Associated Press.
- Trump’s public posts: searches of Truth Social for any dated, verifiable post or archived link matching the claim.
- Greene’s communications: review of Rep. Greene’s official House page at greene.house.gov and public statements from her office.
- Social media and fringe outlets: examination of screenshots, reposts and smaller sites; these lacked verifiable provenance, timestamps or corroboration by mainstream newsrooms.
Background on Trump–Greene relationship
Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican member of the U.S. House from Georgia, has been aligned with Trump-supporting factions and has frequently championed his agenda in Congress. Trump has a documented history of endorsing controversial candidates who support his priorities; those endorsements and alignments are recorded in major media coverage and congressional sources.
The phrase “ranting lunatic” and claims that Trump said Greene “doesn’t return her phone calls anymore” appear in social posts, but such items lack independent verification.
Why the claim matters
A public withdrawal of an endorsement by a former president is consequential: it can reshape donor behavior, influence primary challenges, and alter voter perceptions. For journalists and readers the central issue is verification — whether there is a primary-source statement, a verifiable social post, or corroboration from multiple reputable newsrooms.
Reporting standards and verification steps
This report followed standard checks:
- Cross-checking major news organizations for corroboration.
- Searching the platform where the alleged statement was reportedly made (Truth Social).
- Checking official communications from Greene’s congressional office (greene.house.gov) and Trump’s public communications.
- Reviewing social posts and screenshots for provenance; many viral items lacked metadata or stable links that enable independent verification.
At the time of publication — Nov. 15, 2025 — none of these steps produced a verifiable source confirming the claim.
Sources consulted
- The New York Times (site search)
- The Washington Post (site search)
- CNN (site search)
- Reuters (site search)
- The Associated Press
- Truth Social
- Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene official House site
Rumors, wording and social media context
The specific language — including the phrase “ranting lunatic” and claims about missed calls — appears on social posts and smaller websites. Such posts frequently are screenshots without timestamps or durable links. Journalists rely on direct posts from a principal’s verified account or corroboration from multiple reputable outlets; those markers are absent here.
How similar political disputes have played out
When high-profile endorsements are rescinded, the change is typically traceable: a dated post on a verified account, a press release, or reporting from multiple newsrooms that have contacted the parties. The absence of these sourcing markers in this instance suggests caution.
Implications for Las Vegas, Nevada
Economic and campaign fundraising effects
Nevada — especially Las Vegas — is a battleground where primary dynamics and national endorsements can steer fundraising and resource allocation. Unverified rumors about party splits could cause donors to hesitate until claims are confirmed, altering short-term money flows in Nevada races.
Political consequences for local Republicans
Moderate, urban voters in Las Vegas value clarity and stability. If national GOP politics are dominated by unverified disputes, local candidates may be pressured to take stands or distance themselves from national figures, complicating messaging in a swing environment.
Social and community impact
Unverified national political rumors can filter into local discourse among activist networks and engaged voters. In Las Vegas, such rumors could intensify debates at town halls, on local radio and in neighborhood social feeds even if the underlying claim remains unproven.
Cultural relevance and voter perceptions
Many Las Vegas voters are pragmatic and issue-focused; persistent rumors about national party discord may push moderates toward candidates emphasizing local problem-solving over national drama.
Practical effects for voters and campaigns
Campaign volunteers, field organizers and party offices rely on accurate information. A confirmed endorsement change would alter talking points and outreach. For now, campaigns should continue to use confirmed sources and avoid amplifying unverified claims.
Reporting guidance for local readers
Voters in Las Vegas should await confirmation from reputable national and local outlets before accepting or sharing claims about endorsements. Major developments are typically reported by multiple reputable newsrooms and include direct quotes or verifiable social-media posts on official accounts.
Reporting by Times Media Service; sources checked include national news organizations and official public pages listed above.
